[Info-vax] Intel junk...Kernel-memory-leaking Intel processor design flaw forces Linux, Windows redesign

[Jan-Erik Soderholm]

Den 2018-01-09 kl. 14:16, skrev Tim Streater:
> In article <p32eir$3r6$3 at news.albasani.net>, Jan-Erik Soderholm
> <jan-erik.soderholm at telia.com> wrote:
> 
>> Den 2018-01-09 kl. 10:58, skrev Tim Streater:
>>> In article <WOT4C.274768$BH4.101809 at fx02.iad>, Wolf K
>>> <wolfmac at sympatico.ca> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 2018-01-08 14:59, Jan-Erik Soderholm wrote:
>>>> [...]
>>>>> If you run the gasoline engine on bio-fuels produced from plants
>>>>> growing *today*, there is no issue with the C02 emissions.
>>>>
>>>> There is a net addition to the CO2 load, because it costs energy (ie, 
>>>> fuel) to produce the biofuel. That cost can be stated as the proportion 
>>>> of the fuel needed to produce it. That is, how many litres of some fuel 
>>>> does it take to produce 100 litres of the stuff?
>>>
>>> And how much land to produce the 100 litres each year every year? Or to
>>> produce enough biofuel for one vehicle's annual driving?
>>>
>>
>> What kind of "vehicle"? You can probably forget all those V8's...
>>
>> No, bio-fuel is not the only solution. There will be other fueld
>> neededf and at the samre time another way to "build" our communities
>> that does not need the amount of car travels as today.
>>
>> And bio-fuel is not only about growing stuff out on the fields, it
>> is also gas produced from ordinary household waste.
> 
> Biofuel is not a solution at all.
> 

So then, what is the solution to get rid of the fossil fuels?