[Info-vax] x86 Update 4/22/19

[Peter 'EPLAN' LANGSTOeGER]

In article <qacp9f$ni5$2 at gioia.aioe.org>, helbig at asclothestro.multivax.de (Phillip Helbig (undress to reply)) writes:
>I have experience with other editors, but have found none as good as EDT.

I found EDT to start faster then EVE on larger files (because it doesn't load
the whole file) but (therefore ?) was (last time I checked in the 90ties)
40 (!!) times slower on a global string replacement than EVE...

I still don't second your opinion

-- 
Peter "EPLAN" LANGSTÖGER
Network and OpenVMS system specialist
E-mail  Peter at LANGSTOeGER.at
A-1030 VIENNA  AUSTRIA              I'm not a pessimist, I'm a realist