[Info-vax] x86 Update 4/22/19

[Dave Froble]

On 5/2/2019 2:56 PM, Peter 'EPLAN' LANGSTOeGER wrote:
> In article <qacp9f$ni5$2 at gioia.aioe.org>, helbig at asclothestro.multivax.de (Phillip Helbig (undress to reply)) writes:
>> I have experience with other editors, but have found none as good as EDT.
>
> I found EDT to start faster then EVE on larger files (because it doesn't load
> the whole file) but (therefore ?) was (last time I checked in the 90ties)
> 40 (!!) times slower on a global string replacement than EVE...
>
> I still don't second your opinion
>

It sort of depends upon usage.

I write small modular pieces of code.  A couple hundred lines is big for 
me.  No problem there for EDT.  Does make for lots of modules.  But 
small specific purpose modules sure makes it harder to have logic 
problems.  YMMV.

Now, if one chooses to write 50,000 lines of code in a single routine, 
then yes, there could be issues.

-- 
David Froble                       Tel: 724-529-0450
Dave Froble Enterprises, Inc.      E-Mail: davef at tsoft-inc.com
DFE Ultralights, Inc.
170 Grimplin Road
Vanderbilt, PA  15486