[Info-vax] How to Avoid Old Software, Old Bugs?
Dave Froble
davef at tsoft-inc.com
Wed Nov 13 15:11:47 EST 2019
On 11/13/2019 12:49 PM, Scott Dorsey wrote:
> Stephen Hoffman <seaohveh at hoffmanlabs.invalid> wrote:
>>
>> ...the usual and effectively-futile requests for re-debugging old and
>> long fixed bugs rather than staying current,
>
> There are many popular systems where one has a choice between old bugs
> that are fixed in newer releases, and new bugs that have been introduced
> in newer releases.
There is the issue. There is a lot to be said in favor of "if it ain't
broke, don't fix it".
As a developer, I'm running the latest from VSI. The worst, and the
best, that can happen is I run into something and I report it to VSI.
However, a production system usually cannot afford to have problems.
One might attempt testing, but the real test of any such system is
actually using it. So, it can be a bad decision, either way.
It's why someone was recently looking for a MiceoVAX 3100 Model 98.
They may have performed extensive testing and certification, and would
really rather not have to go through that procedure again if they can
avoid it.
--
David Froble Tel: 724-529-0450
Dave Froble Enterprises, Inc. E-Mail: davef at tsoft-inc.com
DFE Ultralights, Inc.
170 Grimplin Road
Vanderbilt, PA 15486
More information about the Info-vax
mailing list