[Info-vax] SOLVED : Re: Process quota problem after upgrade to 8.4-2L1

[Dave Froble]

On 12/22/2020 2:59 PM, abrsvc wrote:
> On Tuesday, 22 December 2020 at 14:48:14 UTC-5, Dave Froble wrote:
>> On 12/22/2020 1:05 PM, Arne Vajhøj wrote:
>>> On 12/22/2020 9:33 AM, Phillip Helbig (undress to reply) wrote:
>>>> In article <rrsk17$10p8$1... at gioia.aioe.org>, Joukj
>>>> <jo... at hrem.nano.tudelft.nl> writes:
>>>>> Thanks Hoff, You pointed me to the Right solution: Doubling all the
>>>>> pql_m* parameters did not help. But setting PQL_MPGFLQUOTA to 18000000
>>>>> (may be too high but set the same as for "user" system) did the trick.
>>>>> So also Tad's suggestion was correct. It wer the pagefile-quota.
>>>>
>>>> I'll see if this helps my problem. I remember adjusting quotas, but not
>>>> system parameters.
>>>
>>> My understanding is that setting PQL_MPGFLQUOTA sets
>>> the minimum PGFLQUOTA so that even those usernames
>>> with lower values in SYSUAF get the PQL_MPGFLQUOTA
>>> value.
>>>
>>> Are there scenarios where PQL_MPGFLQUOTA is required because
>>> SYSUAF value is not used??
>>>
>>> Arne
>>>
>>>
>> This is from 30+ year old memory. Beware!
>>
>> There are times when no user account is yet available. At that time,
>> the PQL quotas are used. Should one not be adequate, the debugging gets
>> "interesting".
>>
>> At least that's my dim recollection of the issue.
>> --
>> David Froble Tel: 724-529-0450
>> Dave Froble Enterprises, Inc. E-Mail: da... at tsoft-inc.com
>> DFE Ultralights, Inc.
>> 170 Grimplin Road
>> Vanderbilt, PA 15486
>
> PQL parameters are used when the particular values are not specified in the CREPRC call.
>

Yep,  that's what I was about, creating detached processes.

-- 
David Froble                       Tel: 724-529-0450
Dave Froble Enterprises, Inc.      E-Mail: davef at tsoft-inc.com
DFE Ultralights, Inc.
170 Grimplin Road
Vanderbilt, PA  15486