[Info-vax] [From VSI website] VSI Announces a Strategic Partnership with Sector 7
Stephen Hoffman
seaohveh at hoffmanlabs.invalid
Mon Jan 25 19:58:02 EST 2021
On 2021-01-26 00:20:42 +0000, Jan-Erik Søderholm said:
> Den 2021-01-26 kl. 01:09, skrev Dave Froble:
>>
>> Yep, that's pretty much what I remember you writing, and for your
>> customer, it is not a high cost.
>>
>> But it can be a problem in other environments.
>
> Sure. If you do not need Rdb and what it gives you, don't use it. As
> has been demonstrated here, there are simpler tools that can be used
> too.
Many of which are available at lower cost on other platforms, with
lower costs of entry.
Which makes re-creating the sorts of production sites that many of us
familiar with as much time capsules of the past as a templates for
future deployments.
I've done a fair chunk of work with Oracle Rdb over the years. More
recently, SQLite would suffice for many of those same database
requirements.
Will an appreciable number of existing OpenVMS sites shift to newer
tooling or newer alternatives? For a number of sites, not absent
incentives. The adoption of changes for some sites might require the
retirement of Oracle Classic for instance, or management working toward
reducing reoccurring expenses longer-term. Or some will shift due to
the appearance of competition, and which isn't the best time to start
working on updates.
But then again, there's also a negligible number of new sites and
significantly-new app deployments installing Oracle Rdb or Oracle
Classic on OpenVMS. But that new choice of OpenVMS is where VSI wants
and needs to be, too. x86-64 is part of that.
--
Pure Personal Opinion | HoffmanLabs LLC
More information about the Info-vax
mailing list