[Info-vax] An alternative history of computing
Scott Dorsey
kludge at panix.com
Sun Jul 25 22:09:51 EDT 2021
Simon Clubley <clubley at remove_me.eisner.decus.org-Earth.UFP> wrote:
>On 2021-07-25, Scott Dorsey <kludge at panix.com> wrote:
>> Robert A. Brooks <FIRST.LAST at vmssoftware.com> wrote:
>>>That would be LAT, not DECnet, using a DECserver. They did not
>>>use DECnet. The MOP protocol is used to remotely manage DECservers.
>>
>> And the MOP protocol is patented... but the patent does not provide sufficient
>> information to implement a client. Some people making third party terminal
>> servers have licensed the patent but it is far from open when compared to
>> decnet.
>
>Are you thinking of LAT and not MOP ? The MOP specification is freely
>available, but LAT had (has?) patents against it.
I am in fact, yes.
--scott
--
"C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis."
More information about the Info-vax
mailing list