[Info-vax] Rust as a HS language, was: Re: Quiet?

[Dan Cross]

In article <t2na4b$sdf$1 at dont-email.me>,
Simon Clubley  <clubley at remove_me.eisner.decus.org-Earth.UFP> wrote:
>On 2022-04-07, Dan Cross <cross at spitfire.i.gajendra.net> wrote:
>> I wonder where you are seeing that.  Seriously.  I know and/or
>> have worked with a number of members of the Rust community for
>> several years (members of the core, language, and tool teams,
>> for about 3 years), and they're quite gracious in admitting that
>> it's not the right solution for everything.
>
>That's nice to hear.
>
>As for where I am seeing it, it's more of a combined overall impression
>made up of gushing articles and what appears to be more like an organised
>religious cult (:-)) showing up at the usual places online.
>
>For example, articles that, instead of taking a balanced approach, spend
>the first 95% of the article saying how great and perfect Rust is, and only
>in the last 5% (if at all) start mentioning in passing the unsafe stuff
>"for when you really need to do that stuff".

Could you perhaps provide a citation to one of these articles?

	- Dan C.