[Info-vax] VAX Common Lisp

[Scott Dorsey]

Robert Carleton  <rbc at rbcarleton.com> wrote:
>This is probably kind of a stretch, has VAX Common Lisp survived in some fo=
>rm over the years? I'm aware that Lucid picked it up later on, but it's not=
> clear to me what happened to the VAX Common Lisp product, when Lucid began=
> to divest their assets in the 90s.

I don't know, but I do know that xlisp was more portable and seemed faster
and was free.
--scott
-- 
"C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis."