[Info-vax] Need help mounting shadow set
VAXman- at SendSpamHere.ORG
VAXman- at SendSpamHere.ORG
Thu Oct 8 09:06:37 EDT 2009
In article <ydlzm.12060$U5.165395 at newsb.telia.net>, =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jan-Erik_S=F6derholm?= <jan-erik.soderholm at telia.com> writes:
>VAXman- @SendSpamHere.ORG wrote:
>> In article <lKkzm.12059$U5.165511 at newsb.telia.net>, =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jan-Erik_S=F6derholm?= <jan-erik.soderholm at telia.com> writes:
>>> Richard B. Gilbert wrote:
>>>> Jan-Erik Söderholm wrote:
>>>>> VAXman- @SendSpamHere.ORG wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> > Users should not be allowed access to...
>>>>>
>>>>> Richard B. Gilbert wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> > A user should have no reason to...
>>>>>
>>>>> JF Mezei wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> > If a user judges that he does not want....
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> The only thing that is clear here is that the
>>>>> concept of a "user" has to be defined better... :-)
>>>>>
>>>> Anyone other than the system administrator!
>>> Well, yes... :-)
>>>
>>> Still, I have "users" that don't even know what "VMS" or "DCL"
>>> is or that they are "using" it. Then there are developers
>>> that belongs to a whole other kind of a "user"...
>>
>> Hmm... Developers that don't even know what "VMS" or "DCL" is
>> or that they are "using" it.
>
>No the first group of "users" aren't developers at all.
>They are in the production line holding some barcode scanner...
>
>No, I ment there are different groups of "users" with very
>different knowledge of what VMS is. The point was that one
>can not just say "user should" or "user should not" without
>defining what one realy mean with a "user"...
>
>Anyway...
I'm seeing where the humorous dig was lost, perhaps, in translation.
--
VAXman- A Bored Certified VMS Kernel Mode Hacker VAXman(at)TMESIS(dot)ORG
http://www.quirkfactory.com/popart/asskey/eqn2.png
"Well my son, life is like a beanstalk, isn't it?"
More information about the Info-vax
mailing list