[Info-vax] Need help mounting shadow set

[Jan-Erik Söderholm]

VAXman- @SendSpamHere.ORG wrote:
> In article <ydlzm.12060$U5.165395 at newsb.telia.net>, =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jan-Erik_S=F6derholm?= <jan-erik.soderholm at telia.com> writes:
>> VAXman- @SendSpamHere.ORG wrote:
>>> In article <lKkzm.12059$U5.165511 at newsb.telia.net>, =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jan-Erik_S=F6derholm?= <jan-erik.soderholm at telia.com> writes:
>>>> Richard B. Gilbert wrote:
>>>>> Jan-Erik Söderholm wrote:
>>>>>> VAXman- @SendSpamHere.ORG wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  > Users should not be allowed access to...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Richard B. Gilbert wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  > A user should have no reason to...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> JF Mezei wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  > If a user judges that he does not want....
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The only thing that is clear here is that the
>>>>>> concept of a "user" has to be defined better... :-)
>>>>>>
>>>>> Anyone other than the system administrator!
>>>> Well, yes... :-)
>>>>
>>>> Still, I have "users" that don't even know what "VMS" or "DCL"
>>>> is or that they are "using" it. Then there are developers
>>>> that belongs to a whole other kind of a "user"...
>>> Hmm...  Developers that don't even know what "VMS" or "DCL" is
>>> or that they are "using" it.
>> No the first group of "users" aren't developers at all.
>> They are in the production line holding some barcode scanner...
>>
>> No, I ment there are different groups of "users" with very
>> different knowledge of what VMS is. The point was that one
>> can not just say "user should" or "user should not" without
>> defining what one realy mean with a "user"...
>>
>> Anyway...
> 
> I'm seeing where the humorous dig was lost, perhaps, in translation.
> 

Maybe so... :-) A good movie anyway ! :-)
("Lost in Translation", that is).