[Info-vax] The continued ham-stringing of IPsec/VMS - Cui Bono? - TUDs -

[Richard Maher]

Hi JF,

"JF Mezei" <jfmezei.spamnot at vaxination.ca> wrote in message
news:00a1bcc0$0$6698$c3e8da3 at news.astraweb.com...
> Bob Koehler wrote:
>
> >    The point, however, is that there are model to model differences that
> >    the VMS kernel knows about, and VMS releases had better be tested
> >    across all supported models, even if they are have just Alpha or
IA-64
> >    CPUs.
>
>
> Testing/qualification also depends on what equipment the VMS engineering
> team has at their disposal. Remember that the original lab at ZKO no
> longer exists, and it is not known if all of the equipment had been
> moved from ZKO to the "temporary" HP offices when ZKO closed and if all
> of that remaining equipment was moved to India this year (and wether it
> was all connected and setup to be usable).
>

Just whatever they used to test/certify clusters-over-ip, VMS 8.4, Blades,
Tequila and so on. . .

Regards Richard Maher