[Info-vax] Nice printers for OpenVMS?

[David Froble]

JF Mezei wrote:
> John Wallace wrote:
> 
>> partisan. But it is also practical: would tighter gun laws actually
>> lead to fewer gun deaths? You might think it's obvious that they
>> would. But it seems the evidence isn't quite that clear."
> 
> But people forget that a recipe often REQUIRES multiple ingredients. You
> can't bak a chocolate cake with only flour.
> 
> Restricting distribution of firearms may not yield significant results
> in and by itself. But if you combine this with better education, keeping
> ids off the streets, reduced violence on TV for kids etc, then you may
> have enough ingredients to get significant results.
> 
> However, NOT reducing distribution of firearms prevents other meaures
> from working.

Ya know what JF, I think the logic center in you pointy head is empty.  You have 
no basis for making that claim.

If we taught all children some decent moral values, and if we could do something 
about the environments that teach the violence, we'd do much more to reduce the 
violence, such that guns wouldn't be an issue.

How's this for a bee in your bonnet?  You're preaching about guns in the US. 
Are you aware that it is Canadian law that any aircraft operating in most of the 
Northern part of the country is REQUIRED to carry weapons?